MAP

Monday, 23 October 2017

A NEW VIEW ON GRAVITY AND THE DARK SIDE OF THE COSMOS: Erik Verlinde Public Lecture

ARE OUR EMAILS, ORAL PRESENTATION IN INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE
OR BLOGS NOT A LEGAL?

IF ALIENS ARE PRESENT & THEY APPROACHES US THEN WHAT WE SAYS 
FIRST SPEAK/WRITE IN OUR SCIENTIFIC LANGUAGE?

IS OUR SCIENCE SO NARROW?

IS THEIR PRESENCE NOT ENOUGH TO PROVE  THEIR SUPERIORITY IN TECHNOLOGY & THOUGHT PROCESS. SHOULD NOT WE TRY TO LEARN FROM IT?

‘OUT OF BOX THINKING IS ESSENTIAL IN SCIENCE’


I am the individual researcher, working on ‘Theory of Everything on the basis of Dark Atom & Dark Energy’.

I had given oral presentation in the International Science Conference, Vietnam on “Planetary System – a synergistic view” [19th – 25th, July’ 2015]. My topic was “Regeneration of Star & formation of a Solar system – a Potter man's concept”.

Later NASA also hinted the role of SOPERNOVA in planet formation.

had also applied [after receiving the mail of James Forrest sir on 11th, Nov.’2016 & confirmation by Academic Program Manager on 07th, Dec.’2017] for ‘Perimeter Scholars International, 2017-18 but unfortunately not selected.

Kindly refer to “A new view on gravity and the dark side of the cosmos: Erik Verlinde Public Lecture on 07th, Oct.’2017 in Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics, Canada”


In this lecture he explained Gravity as a side-effect, not a cause, of what happens in the universe’.

Sir, I had also written in 2013 that 'Gravity' is an 'Effect', which is PULLING by nature, but its CAUSE is certainly not a PULLING FORCE as it has been assumed, claimed & proved time and again’.


Reference:

A paper "GRAVITY"- a PUSHING FORCE [-a "Layman concept of Unified Dark Energy"]" sent by me on 17th, Aug.'2013 to one of the reputed Journal 'General Relativity and Gravitation’, It was rejected due to scientific language.

MANUSCRIPT No.   GERG-D-13-00356      [I have mail & pdf - file generated by the Journal]


In this manuscript I had not only explained the factors on which gravity depends but also explained the different phenomenon like tide, variation of gravity at different height, expansion of universe, reason of extra force on other side of the moon etc.

I already raised following questions in my blog “An Open Letter” ON 25th, March’’2016

What if I get a paper & I reject it on the ground of scientific language and after few years someone is saying the same but in so called scientific language?

Is it JUSTIFIED to give no credit to the original writer?

I opine that in science facts are more important than language because science is trying to search facts from CITIZEN SCIENTISTS, from MAYA PROPHECIES & from ANCIENT MONUMENTS?

Thanks to PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS for searching science.”


I had also written the same in e-mail to different genius of our scientific world including John Moffat sir on 29th, Mar.’2016, Ashtekar sir on 28th, Mar.’2016, Lukash Vladimir Nikolaevich sir on 28th, Mar.’2016, Sandip P Trivedi sir 28th, Mar.’2016 and others.


My other comments on Gravity are:

(i)  'PLANCK' PUTS EINSTEIN TO THE TEST’  [Indicate role of Dark energy in         GRAVITATION]

        [PL. REF. MY COMMENTS IN IT]

(ii) ‘WHAT IS DARK ENERGY?’ February 1, 2016 by Thomas Kitching, Ucl, The               Conversation                                    [Indicate Pushing nature of GRAVITATION]
        
        [PL. REF. MY COMMENTS IN IT]

Since 2013, I have been not only saying but also explained that it is ‘PUSHING FORCE’ & ‘ARISING DUE TO DARK ENERGY’.


I SEEK YOUR HELP & EXPERT ADVICE ON

a.  How I proceed further? I don't know how to write scientific paper but have hard copy of my work on many   topics    [ref. my all comments in my blog - www.swarajgroups.blogspot.in]?

b.  How I give reference of what I had written in my oral presentation because organising committee had not   published the proceeding that year. [But I have original PPT presentation; any agency can check its   originality. There is no change since July ’2015]

After confirmation from organising committee that they were not going to publish proceeding, I   had taken DOI from FIGSHARE, but, it is also not working.


c.  How I refer my unpublished paper? It is very important for coming science? [I have original PDF; any agency can check its originality. There is no change]

d. How I present my all raw data/work immediately before SCIENCE COMMUNITY for further discussion?   Since 2013 I am seeking platform.

It is least expected by the individual researcher from the established scientist of the world.

I don’t want a certificate of correctness at this stage of science, I only want to put my handwritten work in record.

If it is in record I can take professional help to convert it in scientific language or in book.

All the comments, views or 2nd opinion in my blog, in different science magazines/periodicals/blogs are the part of Universal science [based on 100% stuffs - including dark atom & white atom]

Let us think, instead of expending millions & trillions each year, thousands may change the concept of science. I am confident about my hypothesis.

Some people may say it is speculation, but I want to ask ‘IS ANY NEW SPECULATIVE HYPOTHESIS CAN EXPLAINS/RE-EXPLAINS/ PREDICTS SO MANY PHENOMENONS mentioned in my blog / conference / magazine / periodical / other’s blogs?


SOME IMPORTANT LINKS ARE:

"THE FABRIC OF SPACE AND TIME IS IN TURMOIL" --More on Stephen Hawking's Black Hole Update, - 14th, Feb.'2014



UNIVERSAL SCIENCE – on the basis of White Atom, Dark Atom & Dark Energy



“THEORY of EVERYTHING”- 1st step on the basis of Dark Energy & Dark M“THEORY of EVERYTHING” – 1st  Step on the basis of Dark Energy & Dark Matter



WHY "THEORY OF EVERYTHING - ON THE BASIS OF DARK ATOM & DARK ENERGY" IS IMPORTANT 



LIGO'S TWIN BLACK HOLES MIGHT HAVE BEEN BORN INSIDE A SINGLE STAR



WHAT IF EINSTEIN SEEMS RIGHT WITHOUT HIS THEORIES & PREDICTIONS?



GIANT EXOPLANET HUNTERS: LOOK FOR DEBRIS DISKS, October 11, 2017




Are we standing on the brink of a new scientific revolution that will radically change our views on space, time, and gravity?
In most circumstances, the theories of Einstein and Newton adequately describe gravity, but on cosmological scales, big questions arise, particularly surrounding the nature of dark matter and dark energy.
These questions are ushering in a revolution in theoretical physics – a completely new view on spacetime and gravity. Research in string theory and black hole physics, involving key concepts of quantum information theory, reveals a deep connection between the structure of space-time and the origin of gravity.
This research suggests that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature, but rather an emergentphenomenon, similar to how temperature is an emergent phenomenon that arises from the movement of particles. That is, gravity is a side-effect, not a cause, of what happens in the universe.
In his October 4 public lecture at Perimeter Institute, Erik Verlinde (University of Amsterdam) explored the core ideas behind this research, and examined the implications of this fast-emerging revolution in our understanding of the universe.